[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Huh?

On Fri, 21 Nov 1997, joseph edward morgan wrote:

> On Fri, 21 Nov 1997, Carl Morris wrote:
> > > Anybody gonna drill him on this bullshit, or am I gonna have to come out
> > > of "hibernation"...:)
> > 
> > Because regardless of my opinions, I don't KNOW whether it's BS or not. ;-)
> > Does anyone have any numbers for pressure drop across the stock meter or
> > a mass air meter that contradicts his?  As for the hype about faster
> > measuring and more accurate processing...whatever...we'll see when someone
> > buys it.
> > 
> 1) You can't make a computer "process" faster by changing what is in the
> data tables.

But the sensor door has intertia, and the electronic meter is probably
faster at reading transients than the door.  

> 2) Just how do you measure "PSI drop" across the meter?

vacuum gauge?
if you know the barometric pressure, and the vacuum in the pipe, you have
enuff to figure it out.


**Join the turbo 2.3 mailing list by sneding your subscription request to:

-71 Pinto, stock 2.3 turbo, 13.67@98, radials
	8.1@85 1/th mile on slicks
	Big intercooler ON!
	T4 Compressor soon to be on!

-85 Merkur, let the modding begin!