[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Huh?



On Fri, 21 Nov 1997, joseph edward morgan wrote:

> On Fri, 21 Nov 1997, Carl Morris wrote:
> 
> > > Anybody gonna drill him on this bullshit, or am I gonna have to come out
> > > of "hibernation"...:)
> > 
> > Because regardless of my opinions, I don't KNOW whether it's BS or not. ;-)
> > Does anyone have any numbers for pressure drop across the stock meter or
> > a mass air meter that contradicts his?  As for the hype about faster
> > measuring and more accurate processing...whatever...we'll see when someone
> > buys it.
> > 
> 
> 
> 1) You can't make a computer "process" faster by changing what is in the
> data tables.

But the sensor door has intertia, and the electronic meter is probably
faster at reading transients than the door.  

> 
> 2) Just how do you measure "PSI drop" across the meter?
> 

vacuum gauge?
if you know the barometric pressure, and the vacuum in the pipe, you have
enuff to figure it out.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

**Join the turbo 2.3 mailing list by sneding your subscription request to:
	ericksco@mhd1.moorhead.msus.edu

Scott
-71 Pinto, stock 2.3 turbo, 13.67@98, radials
	8.1@85 1/th mile on slicks
	Big intercooler ON!
	T4 Compressor soon to be on!

-85 Merkur, let the modding begin! 
------------------------------------------------------------------------