[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: questions

But that totally depends on weight...what did you use as his


>From: 	Mark Peters[SMTP:mpeters@corral.net]
>Sent: 	Friday, February 20, 1998 11:23 AM
>To: 	streutkerc@nku.edu
>Cc: 	2.3L Mailing list
>Subject: 	Re: questions
>streutkerc@nku.edu wrote:
>> more question.  Does an 87mph trap speed sound possible with a 16.49 ET,
>> because thats what I had my first time out ever.
>it sounds like ballpark for a stock TC.
>the calulator on my website comes up with 178 horsepower
>with your specs added. so I would say it couild do better actually.
>  Mark  Peters - Ceiba, Puerto Rico -webmaster of The 
>OFFICIAL 20th Anniversary Mustang Website and Registry
>          http://www.corral.net/20anngt
>        1984.5 GT-350 Mustang 2.3litre Turbo
>    1979 ASC McLaren Mustang Convertible 5.0litre