[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Huh?



On Mon, 2 Mar 1998, Matt R Carlson wrote:
> 
> I sat and thought about this one for a while too, but I think what they 
> were trying to say is that you can retard the cam so you get more power 
> on the top end, and you won't loose as much power on the bottom end as 
> you would doing this on a NA motor. Therefor you get the better top end 
> without hurting low end as much as....

Umm, if you say so..
Strange way of sayin it. ok


 There was more to the post than 
> you quoted that would make it a little clearer i think.
> or am I missing something here?
> 

I did cut something, but it was extra crap, or so it seemed.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
		The Pinto Page:  www.eng.usf.edu/~shidel

**Join the turbo 2.3 mailing list by sending your subscription request to:
	ericksco@mhd1.moorhead.msus.edu

Scott
-71 Pinto, stock 2.3 turbo, 13.67@98, radials
	8.1@85 1/8th mile on slicks
	Big intercooler ON!
	T4 Compressor soon to be on!

-85 Merkur, let the modding begin! 
------------------------------------------------------------------------